This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
university:tools:pluto:users:amp [15 May 2018 01:44] – [Measurements] Travis Collins | university:tools:pluto:users:amp [21 Jan 2019 14:13] (current) – [Peak to Average] Robin Getz | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
^ Power in mW | Power in dBm | | ^ Power in mW | Power in dBm | | ||
| 0.1 mW | -10 dBm | | | 0.1 mW | -10 dBm | | ||
+ | | 0.3 mW | -5 dBm | | ||
| 1 mW | 0 dBm | | | 1 mW | 0 dBm | | ||
+ | | 3.2 mW | 5 dBm | | ||
| 10 mW | 10 dBm | | | 10 mW | 10 dBm | | ||
+ | | 32 mW | 15 dBm | | ||
| 100 mW | 20 dBm | | | 100 mW | 20 dBm | | ||
+ | | 316 mW | 25 dBm | | ||
A doubling of output power (from 1mW to 2mW) is only +3dBm. A gain of +20dBm, is output power increasing by a factor of 100 times in mW. | A doubling of output power (from 1mW to 2mW) is only +3dBm. A gain of +20dBm, is output power increasing by a factor of 100 times in mW. | ||
Line 73: | Line 77: | ||
whether expressed in percent in dB, PAPR is dimensionless quantity. | whether expressed in percent in dB, PAPR is dimensionless quantity. | ||
+ | |||
+ | When dealing with signals and amplifiers, it is the peak that we need to be concerned about, not the average power in the signal. Different types of modulation schemes have different peak to average power, and this needs to be taken into account. | ||
Line 125: | Line 131: | ||
| 15 | 31.6 | 1.257 V | 3.556 V | | | 15 | 31.6 | 1.257 V | 3.556 V | | ||
| 20 | 100 | 2.236 V | 6.324 V | | | 20 | 100 | 2.236 V | 6.324 V | | ||
+ | | 25 | 316 | 3.976 v | 11.246 V | | ||
+ | |||
The question is, how do we get +20dBm (6.324V < | The question is, how do we get +20dBm (6.324V < | ||
Line 195: | Line 202: | ||
where the autocorrelation of our process or signal < | where the autocorrelation of our process or signal < | ||
- | < | + | < |
In the case of AWGN this autocorrelation is simply: | In the case of AWGN this autocorrelation is simply: | ||
Line 214: | Line 221: | ||
where < | where < | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== S Parameters ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This data was taken on a [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | First we calibrate things with a cable, and connector, to make sure we see what is happening. We expect this to be a flat line, with 0dB of gain. (it is a cable after all). | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then we can look at the S12 of the amplifier board. Here we can see gain between 2 and 3 GHz, with the flat part being between 2.4 and 2.5 GHz, just like we hope. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | If we vary the amplitude at a constant frequency, we can see the P1dB point at +5dBm. In order to keep things operating in the linear region, we should make sure not to drive the amplifer board with more than +5dBm. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Results==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The yellow line is an antenna, the red line is with the same antenna and the amplifier. You can see the +20dB of transmission at 2.4GHz. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ |