Wiki

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
resources:eval:user-guides:circuits-from-the-lab:cn0564 [11 Oct 2021 16:01] – [General Description] Naveen Afzalresources:eval:user-guides:circuits-from-the-lab:cn0564 [13 Oct 2021 11:45] (current) – [INTRODUCTION] Naveen Afzal
Line 9: Line 9:
 {{:resources:eval:user-guides:circuits-from-the-lab:cn0564:spi_i2c.jpg?direct&400|}} {{:resources:eval:user-guides:circuits-from-the-lab:cn0564:spi_i2c.jpg?direct&400|}}
  
-The distance limitation is one of the key disadvantages of these interfaces. System designers have traditionally extended these interfaces using repeaters or drivers with a higher drive strength at the expense of increasing the overall cost and power consumption. These solutions may be inconvenient for many applications and have other disadvantages that negate their usability.  For example, if using a repeater the data rate is still limited by the cable length, meaning that you have to lower your bandwidth if you want to increase the cable length. +The distance limitation is one of the key disadvantages of these interfaces. System designers have traditionally extended these interfaces using repeaters or drivers with a higher drive strength at the expense of increasing the overall cost and power consumption. These solutions may be inconvenient for many applications and have other disadvantages that negate their usability.  For example, there could be large distances between point to point systems resulting in the ends of the connecting cables having differences in the local ground potentials. This can cause major issues and damage either the controller or the remote node. 
-In addition, when there are large distances between point to point systemsthe ends of the connecting cables typically have some differences in the local ground potentials, which can cause major issues and damage either the controller or the remote node. +
  
 The circuit shown in Figure (1) solves the problem of long distance, robust, SPI/I2C communication simply and easily without any sacrifices to circuit component count, operating speed, or software complexity. Ideal operation in high noise, harsh industrial environments require tolerance to large ground potential differences. The SPI/ I2C extenders feature robust transceivers which operate over an extended common mode range of ± 25V (for SPI communication) and ± 15V (for I2C communication) for distances up to 1200m. Each link consists of a single device at either end of the cable, capable of being powered from 3V to 5.5V, while a separate logic supply The circuit shown in Figure (1) solves the problem of long distance, robust, SPI/I2C communication simply and easily without any sacrifices to circuit component count, operating speed, or software complexity. Ideal operation in high noise, harsh industrial environments require tolerance to large ground potential differences. The SPI/ I2C extenders feature robust transceivers which operate over an extended common mode range of ± 25V (for SPI communication) and ± 15V (for I2C communication) for distances up to 1200m. Each link consists of a single device at either end of the cable, capable of being powered from 3V to 5.5V, while a separate logic supply
Line 26: Line 25:
  
 and many more...\\ and many more...\\
- where remote sensing and increased distance between the measurement source and the control circuitry is a design requirement for solving network security issues, achieving good timing precision, or for safety purposes when monitoring conditions in a harsh environment.+ where remote sensing and increased distance between the measurement source and the control circuitry is a key design requirement for safety purposes when monitoring conditions in a harsh environment.
 ---- ----
 =====  SYSTEM TOPOLOGY ===== =====  SYSTEM TOPOLOGY =====
resources/eval/user-guides/circuits-from-the-lab/cn0564.txt · Last modified: 13 Oct 2021 11:45 by Naveen Afzal